Same Streets
← All stories

The Transit Case That Made the County Pay

A Stevens County surveyor ordered the tool he needed; commissioners refused the bill. The state Supreme Court said the county was liable.

The case of W. M. Manning vs. the Board of County Commissioners of Stevens County was decided in the Supreme Court this week in favor of Mr. Manning.

The point in dispute in the case was whether or not a county officer had the right to order necessary supplies, and whether the county is liable in such cases. Mr. Manning ordered a surveyor's transit, and the commissioners refused to pay it, claiming that the surveyor and not the county should furnish the instrument. Mr. Manning brought suit against the county and won in the Superior Court. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court and has been affirmed.

“The point in dispute in the case was whether or not a county officer had the right to order necessary supplies, and whether the county is liable in such cases.”

— Printed in The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1908
Then · 1908118 years apartNow · 2026

The case turned on a small piece of equipment but a large question: when public employees buy what the job requires, who pays? Modern city halls and counties still litigate purchasing authority and liability in much the same way.

The original page

The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1908-09-24. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, SEP 24, 1908, Page 7
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
48.54657, -117.90554 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗