Same Streets
← All stories

The Judge, the Ballot, and the $2,000 Reprieve

A losing judicial candidate tried to force Stevens County to reprint every ballot. A Tuesday court ruling stopped him—and spared the treasury a costly last-minute scramble.

George A. Allen, late candidate at the primary for non-partisan judge, attempted to make trouble for County Auditor Savage in the matter of printing the official ballots, but failed to do so. The ballots had all been printed and were being taken out by messengers to the various precincts when Mr. Allen took exception to the manner in which the judiciary ballot was printed.

The auditor had placed the name of D. H. Carey, nominated at the primary on three tickets—Republican, Democratic and Socialist. The claim was made that the name should also appear on the Prohibition and Independent party tickets.

Mr. Allen had been nominated for judge by the Prohibition party, and had attempted to get his name on the Prohibition ticket, but the auditor refused to do this. Mr. Allen then began proceedings in the superior court to mandamus Mr. Savage, requiring him to reprint the ballots and place the judiciary ticket in a column by itself. The case was heard in the superior court Tuesday and the court denied the application of Mr. Allen, thus saving the county the cost of printing and sending out new ballots, which would have cost at least $2,000. Mr. Allen's friends will therefore be unable to vote for him unless they use stickers or write in his name. Judging from the returns at the primary there will not be enough of these votes to cause any worry on the part of Judge Carey.

“The court denied the application of Mr. Allen, thus saving the county the cost of printing and sending out new ballots, which would have cost at least $2,000.”

— Printed in The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1908
Then · 1908118 years apartNow · 2026

Ballot design and access fights are not new: Allen's mandamus bid was an early version of a candidate suing over how his name appeared. Then as now, the cost and deadline pressure of reprinting ballots can decide whether a legal challenge is practical.

The original page

The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1908-10-29. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, OCT 29, 1908, Page 1
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
48.54657, -117.90554 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗