Seattle’s 1889 Debates on Race and Rule
A local group of attorneys gathered at a private cottage to debate the explosive question: 'Shall negro majorities rule?'
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A rather unique social gathering will take place at the home of Mr. and Mrs. Fred H. Peterson on Saturday evening, June 1, the principle attraction being a discussion of the question 'Shall negro majorities rule?' by six of Seattle's leading young attorneys. The affirmative will be presented by Messrs. E. F. Blaine, T. B. Hardin and Charles E. Patterson. The negative by B. H. J. Pennefather, Lewis and John G. Barnes. Eben Smith, esq., will preside. Informal invitations will be sent to as many friends as can be comfortably accommodated in the cottage of Mr. and Mrs. Peterson.
“A rather unique social gathering will take place... the principle attraction being a discussion of the question 'Shall negro majorities rule?'”
This 1889 event serves as a stark artifact of the era's civic discourse, where local elites held 'parlor debates' to weigh the basic democratic rights of Black citizens as abstract political theories. It mirrors modern challenges where the legacy of such exclusion still informs the tension between private discourse and public equity in Seattle's rapidly changing civic landscape.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.