Same Streets
← All stories

Dry County? Newport Saloons Take Local Option to Court

Stevens County's rural voters prepare for a no-license election while Newport saloonkeepers challenge the September vote and Springdale's dry petition dies on a technicality.

County Unit to Vote Tuesday, November 9th.

The Stevens county unit, comprising the territory outside the incorporated towns, will vote on the question of "no license for liquor traffic" on Tuesday, Nov. 9. According to all reports the county unit will go dry, as the ranchers generally do not favor the idea of having saloons in the country and in the smaller towns, where there can be no municipal regulation of the traffic. A committee has been named from each precinct to see that the vote is gotten out and to work for local option.

Voters residing in precincts in which incorporated towns are located are required to register. The registration books for Newport precinct are in the hands of Edward Britton. The books will close Oct. 29, ten days before the election.

The case of the local saloons against the town, testing the validity of the local option election held in Newport Sept. 7, has again been postponed and will be heard at Colville next Monday, Oct. 25. Cannon & Lee represent the town in the case and Jesse P. Grinstead, of Colville, appear for the saloon men.

At Springdale the local option workers ran up against a technicality in the law, which will require them to get up a new petition. The petition of 25 citizens asking for an election was presented to the council Saturday evening, but that body refused to act on the petition for want of authority. The "dry" forces had addressed their petition to the town council, instead of the town clerk, as required by law, and the result was that their petition was killed. It will now be necessary for them to do the work of obtaining signatures to the petition all over again.

“According to all reports the county unit will go dry, as the ranchers generally do not favor the idea of having saloons in the country ...”

— Printed in The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1909
Then · 1909117 years apartNow · 2026

Local option was a precinct-by-precinct dry run for Prohibition, and the 1909 fight shows how liquor regulation was fought through petitions, registration deadlines, and court challenges. Washington went dry in 1916, but the same arguments over local control and moral regulation still shape alcohol policy.

The original page

The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, 1909-10-21. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Newport Miner (Newport, WA) 1899-Current, OCT 21, 1909, Page 1
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
48.17963, -117.04326 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗