The Price of a 'Better Life': A Sunnydale Convict’s Plea
A local man faces ten years in the penitentiary, raising questions about justice and the fairness of the county jail system in late-1880s Seattle.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
John Giblin, the Sunnydale man convicted of larceny, was brought into court at 10 o’clock to receive his sentence. His attorneys made a motion for a new trial, arguing the defendant had been deprived of material witnesses due to the negligence of officers of the court, and that the instructions given to the jury were of such a nature as to influence them against the defendant. Judge Hanford overruled the motion, stating that the defendant was furnished with every facility for a fair trial. When asked if he had anything to say why sentence should not be imposed upon him, Giblin asked the court to be merciful and promised to lead a better life when his punishment was over. Attorney E.M. Carr made an appeal for his client, asking that mercy be shown on account of his exemplary life in the past. Judge Hanford then sentenced Giblin to ten years' imprisonment in the penitentiary and to pay the costs. Shortly afterward, Giblin had his attorney return to court to ask that he be sent to the penitentiary at once, in order that he might be serving out his sentence while the appeal was pending, instead of remaining in the county jail where his time in prison would not be credited to him.
“He asked the court to be merciful, and promised to lead a better life when his punishment was over.”
This 1888 account highlights a perennial struggle: the disparity in judicial outcomes and the harsh reality of pre-trial detention. Just as Giblin fought to have his jail time count toward his eventual sentence, modern criminal justice advocates still fight against a bail and sentencing system that often penalizes the poor for the duration of their legal proceedings.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.