Same Streets
← All stories

A Million Dollars in Doubt: Tacoma's Council Moves to Legalize Its Own Debt

Behind closed doors, council members scheme to validate nearly $1,000,000 in city bonds — and to slip a new charter and a purge of salaried offices onto the same ballot, over the objections of the mayor and department heads.

Tacoma, July 1. — Special. — The history of the secret meeting of the council Saturday has come to light. It was called, as published in the Post-Intelligencer, for the purpose of talking over the proposition of calling a special election to validate the city's indebtedness. When, however, the council got down to business in conferring with the heads of departments, a snag was struck. The council wanted to have elected at the validation election fifteen freeholders to frame a new charter; the mayor and heads of city departments opposed. The Populist councilmen were especially urgent to incorporate the freeholders' election into the validation election, their object being to abolish the board of public works, and to do away with several other salaried offices.

The council has prepared a statement showing the exact condition of city finances, explaining how the indebtedness, which aggregates nearly $1,000,000, was incurred, and explaining that there is a doubt as to its validity, because of a difference of opinion as to the manner prescribed by charter for calculating the assessment on which the per cent limit of indebtedness is fixed. This statement was read at the secret meeting by Councilman Norton. It was proposed to have the document signed by all the members of the council, by the mayor and by all other city officials, and presented to the people preparatory to the call for the election, which will probably be held in August. When the council began talking of holding a freeholders' election at the same time the city officials demurred to signing the statement if anything other than validation was to be voted on at the election. The reasons given were that the two issues should be kept distinct and apart, so that the voters might not be confused.

No decision was reached at the secret meeting, and the matter has gone over to the special meeting Friday.

“The two issues should be kept distinct and apart, so that the voters might not be confused.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895
Then · 1895131 years apartNow · 2026

Tacoma's 1895 council tried to bundle a debt-validation vote with a charter rewrite designed to abolish rival offices — a maneuver that would be instantly recognizable to anyone who has watched a modern city pack a ballot with unrelated measures. The underlying question, whether a nearly million-dollar debt was even legally incurred, is the same fight cities still have over bond authority and fiscal transparency.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-07-02. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JUL 2, 1895, Page 6
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.24550, -122.43833 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗