Same Streets
← All stories

Federal Officials Reverse Exclusion Ruling

A legal dispute over the transit of Chinese laborers through the United States reaches a local milestone.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

WASHINGTON, July 12.—Mr. Tweedy, representing the Northern Pacific, made an argument before Secretary Windom yesterday in favor of the transit through United States territory of the twelve Chinamen who recently arrived en route to China via San Francisco. The collector at that port, regarding them as laborers within the meaning of the exclusion act, refused to allow them to land. The decision was reversed.

“The collector at that port, regarding them as laborers within the meaning of the exclusion act, refused to allow them to land.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889
Then · 1889137 years apartNow · 2026

This item illustrates the rigid, often capricious nature of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which forced railroads and shipping interests into complex legal battles to move people across the country. It marks a period when Seattle’s waterfront was a literal and figurative frontline for immigration policy, foreshadowing modern debates over transit and border control.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-07-21. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JUL 21, 1889, Page 3
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗