The 1889 Great Seattle Thirst
As Seattle boomed toward 30,000 residents, the city faced a critical choice: build a dual system of salt water for fire and fresh for drinking, or bet everything on Lake Washington.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The water problem which now stares Seattle in the face appears to be one of those matters which everybody is anxious to leave to everybody else. In the meantime we are without adequate fire protection, and the insurance companies, always prompt in such emergencies, have made a horizontal advance in their rates. The letter from Judge Hanford, which we print this morning, is timely and to the point. The proposition for a salt water system for fire protection in the business district is very attractive, but it would certainly be a mistake to create and maintain two water systems when one could be made to serve as well. The longer this question is studied, the more firmly we become convinced that the only reasonable and practical policy at this time is to buy the works of the Spring Hill Company and to develop them to meet the immediate necessities of the situation. Judge Hanford argues that instead of a separate salt water system, the city should purchase the Spring Hill plant and enlarge the capacity of the works. He suggests that if Lake Washington water is fit for home use, it is good for all other purposes, and a supply can be obtained from that source quicker than from any other. Something must be done speedily to give us an adequate supply of water or the city must stop growing.
“Something must be done speedily to give us an adequate supply of water or the city must stop growing.”
In 1889, Seattle was paralyzed by the 'water problem' and the threat of catastrophic fires—concerns that led directly to the eventual municipalization of the water system. Today, Seattle faces a different kind of scarcity: a housing and utility grid strained by rapid population growth, proving that the struggle to scale infrastructure to meet the city's ambition is as old as the city itself.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.