The Struggle for Rail Regulation
Washington's constitutional convention wrestles with whether to empower a commission to oversee railroad giants.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The article on corporations was finally disposed of today after a long and fruitless discussion over the railroad commission. Delegate Turner made remarks about the presence of a railroad lobby that were construed to reflect upon members of the convention, though he later explained he meant nothing personal. The debate centered on section 21, which would have established a commission. Delegate Turner offered a substitute, but the opposition was determined to kill the clause. During the session, delegates also debated anti-discrimination measures for express companies and a proposal to prohibit railroads from issuing free passes to state officials.
“I do not say improperly, and I do not say that any other member has been approached improperly. It is a well known fact that legislation in the past has been influenced by corporations.”
This debate mirrors the perpetual civic struggle in Seattle to regulate large corporate interests and public utilities. The 1889 delegates were essentially arguing about the same 'growth machine' vs. 'public oversight' friction that shapes modern municipal politics in the city.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.