Washington's 1889 Convention Debates Land Ownership, Bribery
Delegates in Olympia debate alien land rights and anti-bribery measures for the new state charter.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Olympia, Aug. 3.—The constitutional convention spent the day disposing of the remaining sections of the article on the legislative department. A long debate occurred over the section declaring that aliens could only own land under certain conditions, ending in the modification of the clause. A significant section prohibiting bribery and corrupt solicitation was also debated; the convention eventually settled on strict language defining bribery and disqualifying convicted members from holding office. A fierce argument broke out over foreign land ownership, with delegates like Turner arguing that foreign syndicates should not hold vast tracts of American soil, while others warned against scaring off British banks and international investment.
“The ownership of lands by aliens is detrimental to the best interests of the state and is therefore prohibited.”
This debate over foreign ownership of land and legislative ethics echoes modern concerns about foreign capital in the Seattle real estate market. The 1889 delegates were grappling with the transition from a territory to a state, attempting to balance protective populism against the realities of a globalized, capital-dependent economy—a friction that still defines Seattle civic discourse.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.