The Battle for Seattle's Tide Lands
Powerful legal lobbyists and land speculators are maneuvering to seize control of Seattle's valuable waterfront before the constitutional convention can intervene.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
It is understood that the disposition of the tide land question will be made by the constitutional convention. As usual in such matters, the interests of selfishness, greed, and dishonesty have come to a thorough understanding and act in harmony. Their plan, solidified from the beginning, is to throw the question over for determination by the legislature, and to this end they are sparing no effort. Their lobby is very strong, including some of the most adroit and skillful lawyers of the territory, and they are urging the scheme with infinite industry and address. It now remains to be seen if the representatives of the people can be cajoled or frightened into compliance with the wishes of the schemers and into a course contrary to the wishes of the people. It is a straight fight between the private and the public interest and it will be watched with closer attention than any contest yet waged in the convention.
“It is a straight fight between the private and the public interest and it will be watched with closer attention than any contest yet waged in the convention.”
The struggle over Seattle's tide lands—the shallow waters along the waterfront—defined the city's early development. Today, this conflict echoes in ongoing debates over who owns and controls Seattle’s public-private shoreline, from the Port of Seattle’s expansion to the development of the downtown waterfront.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.