The Postmaster General's Forgotten 'Postal Telegraph' Scheme
Before the digital age, a visionary postmaster proposed merging the U.S. Mail with the telegraph to turn instant messaging into a public utility, aiming to bypass corporate monopolies.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Mr. Wanamaker, the Postmaster General, has a theory that there is a large amount of business in the country that would be better handled by the Post Office than by the telegraph companies. His theory is that the government could provide a postal telegraph service. He proposes that in many cases, the telegraph companies would find it more effective to send their messages via the post to the nearest postal station, equipped with a cent stamp to be cleared on the next trip of the carrier serving that district. In many cases, the letter delivery would be no slower than the telegraph delivery; in many cases, it is likely to be more expeditious. Mr. Wanamaker's theory is that the letter carrier can do the messenger's work for him. If the public can have messages transmitted at three-fourths of a cent or a cent per word during the day and perhaps for half a cent per word at night, and can then have them delivered by Uncle Sam's letter carriers at a cost of two cents each, it will get something very closely approximating a postal telegraph. It is obvious that this plan would apply very well to night dispatches, a class of messages very largely used both in social and commercial correspondence. Mr. Wanamaker believes that with cheaper rates, telegraph business would be vastly increased, thereby adding to the revenues of the companies and the postal department.
“It is obvious that this plan would apply very well to night dispatches... Mr. Wanamaker's theory is that the letter carrier can do the messenger's work for him.”
This 1889 proposal for a 'postal telegraph' highlights a recurring American debate about whether infrastructure like connectivity should be a public utility or a private profit-center. Just as Wanamaker argued for the Post Office to modernize communication, modern debates over municipal broadband mirror his fight against private telecom dominance.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.