Same Streets
← All stories

Valentine Scrip Sparks Protest Over Washington Waterfronts

Speculators and land-hungry companies are betting big on a loophole involving obscure 'Valentine scrip' to seize Seattle’s tideflats, setting the stage for a massive legal showdown.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

A storm of protest is brewing in Washington over the use of Valentine scrip on waterfront lands, with reports almost daily being received at the local land office. The recent decision in Washington by Register John B. Reed, regarding applications for certain tide lands by Frank Burns Jr., has added fuel to the fire. Valentine scrip originated from a land grant in California in 1872 to Thomas B. Valentine for services to the government. Because the government stipulated that land should be sold to private persons, Valentine scrip was issued to allow him to select unoccupied public lands. Now, speculators are using this scrip to claim water fronts in Tacoma, Port Townsend, and Seattle, arguing that tide lands—those below high and low water marks—were unappropriated public lands of the United States. In consequence, the scrip has advanced enormously in value. On the other hand, the general status of these lands is held to be the property of the state. Consequently, the law is being invoked, and protests are coming into the land office more rapidly than they can be settled. It is believed that many are trying to assume control of the water fronts of this and other towns to hold them for enormous profits. In Seattle, the water front west of Railroad Street, including Dearborn Street, is now tied up in these filings by the Seattle Improvement Company and the Northern Pacific Dock and Ship Building Company.

“It is believed by many that the present movement in Valentine scrip was started by Seattle capitalists, who hope to realize largely by assuming control of the water fronts of this and other towns.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889
Then · 1889137 years apartNow · 2026

This 1889 land grab for Seattle's tideflats mirrors the ongoing struggle for control over the city’s post-industrial waterfront and the constant tension between public access and private development. Then, as now, the legal ambiguity of land ownership serves as a weapon for those looking to profit from urban expansion.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1889-09-26. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, SEP 26, 1889, Page 5
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.59574, -122.28686 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗