Same Streets
← All stories

The Struggle for American Seafaring

A local captain laments the decline of U.S. merchant shipping as foreign vessels dominate Puget Sound coal routes.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

"I see by the morning papers," said Capt. Gray, "that the British ship Devonshire will go to Nanaimo and load with coal for this port. To a great majority of people this item of shipping news would be passed by without notice, or, if noted at all, would be thought too trifling for a moment's consideration, but to those who go down to the sea in American ships the item does not come without special importance. Does it not seem strange that an English ship can come into our harbor from a deep-sea voyage, and then, after a delay of a day or two only for discharging, can join in the coaling trade, and furnish us with coal for our engines, our furnaces and our firesides? It ought to be apparent to every thinking American citizen that there must be something wrong in our shipping laws and maritime regulations when English vessels can almost monopolize the coal trade on this coast. I can tell you it is humiliating and discouraging to those who are interested in American shipping to see our harbor filled up with foreign vessels, their flags flying in proud supremacy of our own ensign, loading and unloading material either consumed or produced by our own people. There is but one law on the statute book of maritime legislation governing our shipping interests that stands between us and a complete surrender to foreign countries, and that is the law prohibiting foreign vessels from plying between American ports."

“It is humiliating and discouraging to those who are interested in American shipping to see our harbor filled up with foreign vessels, their flags flying in proud supremacy of our own ensign.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1882
Then · 1882144 years apartNow · 2026

Capt. Gray’s 1882 complaint about the 'humiliating' loss of local trade to global maritime interests echoes modern debates over globalized logistics and the protection of domestic industries. Seattle’s harbor remains a focal point for these same tensions, as modern debates over port automation and trade policy continue to frame the city's economic identity.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1882-04-11. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, APR 11, 1882, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗