Same Streets
← All stories

The Fight to Ban Boxing in 1891 Washington

As the state legislature considered a sweeping crackdown on 'prizefighting' in 1891, the proposed law sparked debate over what constitutes public violence versus private athletic exercise.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

Olympia, Feb. 21—Representative Bailee of King County comes to the front this morning as a great moral reformer by proposing the abolition of prizefighting, with or without gloves, in every part of the great state of Washington. Two sections of his bill are: Section 1. That it shall be unlawful for any person or persons to enter into or take part in any prizefighting in the state of Washington. Section 2. That any person or persons entering into, or in any manner taking part in any prizefighting, with or without gloves, or in any boxing contest in any public manner, or for exhibition in any way, shall be fined for each offense not less than $100 nor more than $1,000, or by six months' nor more than two years' imprisonment, or by both. Section 3 makes provision against persons owning or controlling buildings leasing or renting them for prizefighting purposes by inflicting penalties from $50 to $500, and by imprisonment of not less than three months nor more than one year. Section 4 is as follows: 'That nothing in this act shall be so construed as to interfere with members of private clubs sparring or fencing for exercise among themselves.' Representative Hughes had a similar prizefighting bill last year and it was knocked out in the house in the first instance. It is not yet determined at this time whether Mr. Bailee's bill will fare better, or be handled with or without gloves.

“It is not yet determined at this time whether Mr. Bailee's bill will fare better, or be handled with or without gloves.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1891
Then · 1891135 years apartNow · 2026

The tension between 'moral' legislative crackdowns on public spectacle and the protection of private athletic spaces remains a staple of municipal debate. Just as 1891 lawmakers argued over the legitimacy of boxing matches, modern cities continue to navigate the friction between public safety, nightlife regulation, and the preservation of private gathering spaces.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1891-02-22. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, FEB 22, 1891, Page 7
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.03553, -122.90083 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗