The Clam-Seller and the Street-Car: A Seattle Reckoning
When a man was killed by a train on a Seattle street, a bystander's callous comment sparked a confrontation that exposed the deep-seated tensions of the city's growing industrial landscape.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
We were standing close to the railroad crossing. Among the number was a rather pleasant gentleman. He was tall, well-proportioned, and about 55 years of age. He had the appearance of a man of means and looked as if he held a terrible tight grip on life and had no desire to be run over by a coal car. He had just finished telling us of the duty he had to perform in the capacity of a juryman at the inquest over the body of the Chinaman lately killed by the cars.
'Yes, gentlemen,' he said, 'it was the most unpleasant duty I was ever called upon to perform. He was crushed into a jelly. I never saw such a sickening sight in my life.' We desired his opinion as one of the jury who sat on the case, as to whose fault the accident might be attributed. 'Oh, it was entirely his own fault, gentlemen. There was no more need of the man being killed than there is of my studying Hoyle on seven-up. If he had only kept his eyes and ears open he would be peddling clams today; but he is now moving through the realms of glory.'
Suddenly, the old man made a standing jump of about six feet and an empty car was seen to rush by, barely missing him. He was heard to mutter as he went up Commercial Street: 'Just wait until the next Chinaman gets run over, and if I'm alive I'll be on that jury, and if I don't make it warm for that monopoly it's because there's no law to reach their case.' The foregoing is published especially in the interest of the railroad company, as we desire their interests protected until we get married. See to it that that man don't get on the next jury, or our case will be a boneless one.
“There was no more need of the man being killed than there is of my studying Hoyle on seven-up.”
This 1880 encounter captures the lethal intersection of early industrial transit and labor in Seattle—a city built on the back of rail infrastructure. The casual dehumanization of an immigrant worker by a jury member, followed by the irony of that same juror narrowly escaping the same fate, mirrors the ongoing tensions of a rapidly developing city where transit expansion and human life often collide.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.