Same Streets
← All stories

The Political Club That Stood Up to a Partisan Purge

In 1885, a band of concerned citizens formed an 'independent' club to protect the judiciary from political interference, launching a defiant campaign to keep a respected judge on the bench.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

A movement recently was organized at Seattle, composed of some of our leading men of various political opinions, under the name of the 'Young Men’s Independent Political Club.' The aim of the club was to assist in the development of the city, and strictly to prevent the intrusion of their political views into civic management. At the last municipal election the club did good work, and aided very materially in the selection of good officers. Some days since, the club learned with surprise that an effort was being made to have Chief Justice Greene removed, and some other person unknown to the club appointed in his stead. A meeting of the Executive Committee was at once called, the matter laid before them, and the following resolutions were unanimously adopted as the sense of the club: 'Whereas, we are advised that an attempt is being made and a petition being circulated for the removal from the bench of the Honorable Roger Greene, Chief Justice of the Washington Territory, before the expiration of the term for which he was appointed; and whereas, we believe him to be a learned, fearless, impartial and just judge and an honest, upright and useful citizen, entitled to the confidence and support of the people; and whereas, we believe the attempt to remove him is made unjustly and without good cause... therefore be it resolved, that we do most earnestly protest against the removal of Judge Greene from his present honorable position upon the bench of Washington Territory.' A committee of five active members was appointed to draft and circulate for signature the petition referred to in the above resolutions.

“We believe the attempt to remove him is made unjustly and without good cause, and that such removal at this time would be a public calamity.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1885
Then · 1885141 years apartNow · 2026

The 1885 defense of Judge Roger Greene mirrors ongoing tensions in Seattle regarding judicial independence and the influence of partisan political machines in local governance. Then, as now, the pushback came from civic-minded groups attempting to preserve non-partisan stability against external political maneuvering.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1885-01-23. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, JAN 23, 1885, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗