The High Price of an Insult in 1886 Seattle
A local woman learned that in the eyes of the law, verbal abuse was as punishable as a physical strike.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
There seems to be an idea in the minds of some people that they can use abusive language to their neighbors, but unless they actually commit an assault, they cannot be punished. Now, this is altogether a mistake. Our law provides for punishment of an assault with words, the same as an assault with a club. Mrs. E. Welch found this out yesterday. She became angry with Mrs. Ferguson, who keeps a restaurant in the rear of the Arlington Hotel, and used vile and abusive language toward her and her daughter. Mrs. Welch was arrested and, on being taken before Justice Lyon, demanded a jury trial, which was granted her. After a hearing of the case, the jury returned a verdict of guilty and assessed the punishment at one dollar and costs, amounting to forty-six dollars, which sum Mrs. Welch will be compelled to pay today or go to jail.
“Our law provides for punishment of an assault with words, the same as an assault with a club.”
While legal definitions of 'assault' have narrowed, this 1886 case highlights the high cost of neighborhood disputes and the burden of court fees on working-class citizens—a struggle that remains a stark reality in modern municipal courts.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.