Same Streets
← All stories

The Forgotten Case for the Labor Union

A bold 1885 editorial argues that unions are not a threat to society, but a essential safeguard against the 'grinding of the faces of the poor.'

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

There is no groundless prejudice against labor organizations in this country. It is supposed that their object is to extort by threats and violence what they cannot gain by peaceable means. Nothing can be farther from the truth. The riots, massacres, and incendiaries connected with strikes are not due to true organization, but the lack of it. The great damage to society in the struggles of today is in keeping the working classes in a disorganized state. Organization means knowledge, improvement, enlightened views of the rights of labor, judicious demands, and well-timed, concerted, but always peaceable action. The settlement of the conflicts between labor and capital will not be attained by the repudiation of labor unions, but by raising them to a higher level. The great difficulty is in making organizations of ignorant, badly managed, often desperate and hungry workmen sufficiently extensive and perfect to protect their interests. Political economists, like Henry Fawcett, Longe, Massey, W. T. Thornton, Francis A. Walker, and many more, all admit that labor unions have greatly increased wages. Without unionism, employers would be able to dictate as of old; with it, workingmen would have that preparation for war which is the best guarantee of peace. When thousands of workmen are oppressed to the lowest point of endurance by wealthy corporations, Christian men are not at liberty to ignore this question. The monopolists who have grown rich by grinding the faces of the poor are the least hopeful subjects for conversion. This is the explanation of the widening breach between the church and the masses. Industrial partnership between employer and employee would be an effectual remedy, but the adoption of this selfless, beneficent, Christian method of business is not likely to become general. The difficulty is in making the employer see that it would be better for all concerned. They can most quickly be made to see it by an organization of wage-workers sufficiently thorough and extensive to make them masters of legislation and give them an equal voice in determining what shall be their share of the wealth produced by their labor.

“The monopolist who has grown rich by grinding the faces of the poor is the least hopeful subject for conversion.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1885
Then · 1885141 years apartNow · 2026

Written during the rise of the Knights of Labor, this editorial captures a pivotal moment when Seattle's workforce began to organize. Its assertion that unions are a 'guarantee of peace' rather than a cause of chaos echoes today’s ongoing debates regarding labor rights, wage stagnation, and the widening chasm between corporate ownership and the working class.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1885-08-13. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, AUG 13, 1885, Page 1
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗