The Deadly Cost of Lax Oversight on Puget Sound Steamers
A concerned correspondent challenges local authorities to address the criminal negligence allowing faulty boilers to threaten lives on our waters.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Your correspondent in Snohomish is very correct on the idea that he denominates 'shoddy boilers,' or in other words, iron that has been removed from the stove to the steam room. I would like to ask him who should have more knowledge of the dangers to life and property that would result from carrying such in a steam-boat boiler than the firm, the owners? And I would also ask who causes these remeans to be shown in someone’s boiler, if not to economize and increase profit by performing the duties of an engineer? Is not the government inspector to blame? After the blame to steamboat owners, are they not themselves to blame? If the rewards of the boiler inspector's office were curtailed, and the number of applicants' papers for boiler-maker positions, the number of steamboat captains (who illicitly hold licenses as 'engineers and boiler makers') would be found to be in the majority. If there is a fault in the owners of these boats, they are themselves to blame; for through their indifference with the government they have done everything in their power to lower the life-saving standards. The government has given a law, which, if well enforced, will place a good monitor over the bosses of the boats and force them to do their duties honestly and carefully, and see that which will cause a sudden stop to the causes of the deaths of all boiler explosions, and who will not be influenced by the bills and other wealth of the companies.
“I would like to ask him who should have more knowledge of the dangers to life and property that would result from carrying such in a steam-boat boiler than the firm, the owners?”
This 1885 editorial highlights the historic tension between corporate profit and public safety in maritime transport. Today, this resonates with modern debates regarding the regulation of Seattle's ferry systems and the ongoing struggle to ensure infrastructure maintenance keeps pace with regional growth.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.