The Price of a Free Ticket
In 1883, the Post-Intelligencer took a stand against the 'free pass' corruption, where railroad companies leveraged free travel to buy the silence of regional editors.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Post-Intelligencer is pleased to see that the press of the Northwest is freely discussing the free pass evil, and it is better pleased to see that, with a few exceptions, the papers are taking a decided stand against this system of petty bribery. Those who take the opposite ground are the members of the old reliable gang who can be counted upon to be for the railroad and against the people in the discussion of any question that could possibly arise. Of course, holding their own free passes, they must make an effort to defend their legislative brethren, lest, like the Black Falls Chronicle, they receive a terse note from General Western Passenger Agent Charlton, saying, 'My contract with you is that you will not unjustly criticize this company. In consequence of this, it is necessary for me to request you in return to return this transportation furnished you.' Such reading is not pleasant for the free pass gang, and those who compose it dare not denounce bribery and corruption, lest in doing so they would, in Mr. Charlton's opinion, be unjustly criticizing the company. The lot of a passholder is not a pleasant one, whether it be spent in legislative halls or in the editorial rooms of a railroad organ.
“The lot of a passholder is not a pleasant one, whether it be spent in legislative halls or in the editorial rooms of a railroad organ.”
The practice of exchanging 'free passes' for favorable editorial coverage was the 19th-century equivalent of modern 'pay-to-play' influence peddling. Today, the battle for media integrity has shifted from railroad barons to tech giants and algorithm-driven advertising, but the core issue—the independence of the press from the entities it reports on—remains a central tension in the Seattle public square.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.