Seattle’s Lost Bid for the Navy Yard
While the 1876 Congressional committee debated the future of the Mare Island naval site, Seattle’s local press made a bold, visionary pitch for the Sound as the premier industrial hub of the Pacific.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Naval Committee of the House lately presented a proposition to cut down the pay of the officers of the navy to be in keeping with the former reduction of the salaries in the army, but to the credit of that body the measure was voted down. About the same time came up a discussion on a resolution to discontinue the Mare Island Navy-yard, of California, as a construction yard, leaving it simply a naval rendezvous and repair station. The ground assigned for the action was the want of timber at that point and the consequent expense of procuring the necessary lumber, iron, etc. On this point Luttrell, who opposed the bill, remarked: 'We get our iron from California, Oregon and Washington Territory.' He might well have added, truthfully, that we can also get suitable timber in Washington Territory. Attention was called to the fact that Mare Island was the only naval-yard on the Pacific Coast. Nevertheless, the matter was referred for advisement to a board of five Naval Commissioners to report next session. Here at Seattle both timber and iron can be obtained easily, and cheaply, in connection with convenient fresh water harborage and other exceptional facilities. Meanwhile, the long-mooted proposition to select these as attainable seems to be slumbering quietly in a winding sheet of red-tape, pigeon-holed in the Department archives at Washington.
“Here at Seattle both timber and iron can be obtained easily, and cheaply, in connection with convenient fresh water harborage and other exceptional facilities.”
This 1876 editorial highlights Seattle’s long-standing strategy of positioning itself as a vital logistical hub for the Pacific. Over a century later, the tension between regional industrial potential and federal resource allocation remains a central pillar of Seattle's economic and political identity.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.