Same Streets
← All stories

The Great Jury Debate: When Washington Women Fought for the Bench

A landmark 1888 legal dispute threatened to strip women of their newly won right to vote and serve as jurors in Washington Territory.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

The recent rulings have cast doubt on the rights of women in our Territory. Under the code of 1881, the right of suffrage was conferred only upon males, and only male electors were competent jurors. This was the condition until Nov. 18, 1883, when the Legislative assembly of our Territory passed an act to amend the code. By this amendment, the word 'male' was stricken, and under its provisions, the women deposited their ballots and took their seats in the jury box. Now, Judge Longford has decided that the act was technically flawed and that women's participation was legally void. If the Justice's decision is correct, our judges have mistaken the law in permitting women to sit as jurors, and our Supreme Court erred in holding that they are even exercising the right to vote. I have no doubt as to the validity of the laws, and am satisfied that our women may lawfully vote and act as jurors in the future as in the past, but the judges rather than the citizens must decide these questions.

“I have no doubt as to the validity of the laws... but the judges rather than the citizens must decide these questions.”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1886
Then · 1886140 years apartNow · 2026

This 1888 struggle over voting and jury rights highlights how precarious early civil rights were in the Washington Territory, resting on thin legal interpretations that could be wiped away by a single judge. Today, Seattle's civic debates often similarly hinge on legislative technicalities, reminding us that hard-won rights require constant vigilance to maintain.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1886-05-14. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, MAY 14, 1886, Page 2
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗