The Railway Hotel Trap
A scathing critique of a Northern Pacific Railroad ticket that forced passengers to stay at a specific Tacoma hotel to validate their travel.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
A traveler holding a round-trip ticket is compelled to have himself identified at Tacoma, and virtually to stop at 'The Tacoma' hotel. In addition to the resolution now pending in Congress regarding the ownership of townsite companies by the Northern Pacific Railroad Company, it might be well to inquire by what authority the company compels its patrons to stop at a certain town and in a certain hotel. An American tourist should have the right to eat and sleep where he pleases, and when he is prevented from doing so, his liberty is naturally infringed. There are many points in connection with this ticket which occur with great force to any who may be of an inquiring turn of mind, and which are altogether likely to qualify even the wisest and best intentioned. For instance, there is the coupon which is good for three meals and a night’s lodging at 'The Tacoma' Hotel, Tacoma, W. T. Are these meals to be eaten at once, or can they be eaten by the tourist himself, or may he invite two friends to partake with him of these meals? If they must be eaten by the tourist himself, then the tourist shall stay at 'The Tacoma' Hotel, Tacoma, W. T., at least one day and one night, which is all the time allowed him on the ticket after reporting to the 'Manager of The Tacoma Hotel.' Probably nothing but a writ of habeas corpus could deliver the holder of one of these tokens from the iron jaw of 'The Tacoma' until he had strictly fulfilled the conditions of his contract by eating three meals and taking a night’s lodging.
“An American tourist should have the right to eat and sleep where he pleases, and when he is prevented from doing so, his liberty is naturally infringed.”
This 1886 expose highlights a very early version of 'corporate capture' and the bundling of services that echoes modern concerns over platform monopolies and bundled travel/housing services that restrict consumer choice. Today, the debate over how transportation hubs and real estate conglomerates influence local urban life remains as contentious as ever in a rapidly growing Seattle.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.