The Scandal of the Crumbling Hospital
An architect blows the whistle on shoddy bricks and corner-cutting builders at the new Territorial Hospital.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
On September 3rd, 1886, W. B. Boone, the architect and superintendent for the Territorial Hospital construction, formally notified the Board of Building Commissioners that the materials and workmanship were unacceptable. Boone protested that the contractors were using 'salmon' (inferior) bricks that lacked structural integrity, failing to meet the specification of 700 pounds of compressive strength per inch. The contractors had attempted to hide the poor quality by mixing them with better bricks, but the architect insisted that the work was dangerous. Despite his protests, the Board of Commissioners and the contractors had attempted to push forward the construction to meet speed goals, even pressuring Boone to approve the work under threat. Boone ultimately refused to compromise, demanding that the walls be rebuilt properly to ensure the safety of future patients. The newspaper editors concluded that while they did not suspect overt corruption, the board's desire for speed had compromised public trust and called for an independent expert inspection to ensure the building would not collapse.
“A good, hard-burned brick has a tensile strength of 700 pounds per inch, while a salmon or inferior one has but 100 pounds per inch.”
Public infrastructure projects in Seattle have a long history of oversight battles. Today’s concerns over modern high-rise safety and structural integrity mirror these 1886 tensions between architect-led quality standards and contractor-led profit margins.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.