Old Soldiers Fight Politically Motivated Firing
A local group of veterans protests the sudden, unexplained removal of a fellow Union soldier from the Board of Examining Surgeons.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
To the Honorable C. A. Warner, Commissioner of Pensions: We, the undersigned members of the Grand Army of the Republic, respectfully represent that since the organization of the Board of Examining Surgeons at Seattle, it has been composed of Dr. H. Merrick, Dr. Rufus Willard, and Dr. R. L. Smith. Dr. Merrick, a survivor of the late war and a known veteran, has served as a skillful and attentive examiner. However, on September 30th, without any assigned reason, Drs. Merrick and Willard were summarily removed and Dr. H. M. Hall and L. B. Dawson were appointed in their stead. This situation creates a hardship, as wounded and disabled soldiers coming from great distances for examination have been turned away. We believe this removal was requested for political purposes, and we ask for an explanation as to why it is no longer honorable to have fought for the Union.
“Do political exigencies demand the removal of members of the Grand Army of the Republic without cause and at such a cost?”
This reflects the volatile nature of 1880s political patronage, where even medical boards tasked with veterans' pensions were treated as spoils of war. It mirrors modern debates over the politicization of independent administrative and regulatory boards.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.