Same Streets
← All stories

The 'Anti-McGraw' Brawl

A fiery public debate between two local political factions descends into personal insults, revealing deep fractures within the People's Party.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

During the past week, joint discussions took place at Ball-Ballard between I. J. Humes and W. O. Wood, on behalf of the Republican party, and James Rochester and I. P. Bush, on behalf of the Wing-Cochran wing of the People's party. During the course of the debate, a dialogue occurred which illustrates the manner in which the Wing-Cochran campaign has degenerated into a mere personal fight against Mr. McGraw. Humes, in his opening speech, had paid a glowing tribute to the Republican party and to its past achievements. In his reply, Rochester remarked that he did not desire to dispute the good things which Mr. Humes had said of the Republican party. Humes, when he again took the floor, demanded in forcible language that Rochester plainly state his politics. 'I am not a Republican,' finally admitted Rochester. 'No,' thundered Humes, 'all know you are not a Republican, but what are you, then, Rochester? Are you a Democrat, or what are you?' After some hesitation the answer came, 'I am an anti-McGraw man.' And he told the truth. The course pursued by Rochester and his crowd is nothing more than an attack upon Sheriff McGraw. One sentence describes their political views and indicates their hope for their ambition—they are 'anti-McGraw men,' and nothing else.

“Are you a Democrat, or what are you? ... 'I am an anti-McGraw man.'”

— Printed in Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1886
Then · 1886140 years apartNow · 2026

This 1886 political squabble mirrors the enduring nature of Seattle's 'personality-driven' civic battles. Even then, the debate was less about policy and more about the personal vendettas of political rings, a pattern that remains familiar in local elections today.

The original page

Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, 1886-10-23. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Seattle Daily Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, W.T. [Wash.]) 1881-1888, OCT 23, 1886, Page 3
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.67651, -122.38622 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗