Same Streets
← All stories

Abandoned and Destitute: A Public Plea for Support

When an attorney abandons his wife and child in 1892 Seattle, the legal system proves powerless to help—until a local judge intervenes.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

Mrs. A. M. Oliphant, wife of an attorney whose office is in the Squire-Latimer building, made complaint yesterday to Prosecuting Attorney Miller that her husband has deserted her and left her destitute with a baby a year old to support. She has only been here since last August and cannot, therefore, bring an action for divorce and obtain alimony. Mr. Miller informed her that there was no law to compel her husband to support her. Mrs. Oliphant then went to Judge Jacobs and told him of her case. Mr. Jacobs told her that if her husband was a member of the bar association he would see that he was put out. Ascertaining that he did not belong to the bar association he promised to address a letter to the husband and, if he did not mend his ways, the judge would move for his disbarment. Mrs. Oliphant says that they were married at Cincinnati in 1888. According to Mrs. Oliphant's story, her husband told her last fall that his brother was coming to live with them. After a while the two brothers proposed to send for a young lady whom the brother knew in the East. To this she objected. Mr. Oliphant then got mad and, for several nights, left the house entirely unlocked, hoping to drive her away. She was finally forced to give it up. Mr. Oliphant, when asked if he had anything to say in regard to the charges of his wife, said that if anything was said now it would spoil his business. He would not say anything at all in regard to the truth of the charges, and intimated that he knew what the story was even before he was told. He angrily closed the interview by saying: 'I won't say anything. You can't drag me into a domestic scandal.'

“I won't say anything. You can't drag me into a domestic scandal.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

This 1892 account highlights the historical vulnerability of women in the legal system, where basic support was not guaranteed and domestic abandonment was treated as a private scandal. Today, while legal protections for spousal support exist, the struggle for housing and financial stability for single parents remains a critical, recurring issue in Seattle.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1892-01-27. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JAN 27, 1892, Page 5
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗