Abandoned and Destitute, a Migrant Wife Sues for Maintenance
A Seattle tailor's wife, recently arrived from Russia, petitions the court to freeze her husband's bank assets after he refuses to support her and their child.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In a case of novelty instituted in the superior court yesterday, Esther Rosenthal filed a grievance against her husband, B. Rosenthal, of a kind which many women would have redressed by means of a divorce. She only asked the court to compel her husband to support her and her child. In her petition, she says that she and her husband were married in Russia and have one child, now seven years old. Her husband left her and came to this country. He has sent no money for her support nor that of the child, although for a large part of the time he has earned $20 a week as a tailor. She has been compelled to earn a living as best she could. Since she arrived here from Russia, she has been in destitute condition and, finding her husband, went to him for support. He cast her off and refused her assistance, although he has money in bank. She says that she is destitute of food and clothing and forced to depend upon charity for a living, while her husband has money deposited with the Guarantee Loan and Trust Company, which he is attempting to withdraw to remove himself beyond the jurisdiction of the court. She prays the court to restrain the Guarantee Loan and Trust Company from paying this money to her husband. She also asks that her husband be compelled to give her $40 a month for her support and an attorney's fee of $100. The restraining order was granted by Judge Langley.
“She has been compelled to earn a living as best she could... and is forced to depend upon charity for a living, while her husband has money deposited with the Guarantee Loan and Trust Company.”
The struggle for basic survival and the use of the courts to freeze assets during a family crisis remain central to modern domestic legal battles. Rosenthal's story highlights how precarious the immigrant experience was in 1893 Seattle, where the law was often the only recourse for those left with no safety net.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.