The Fight Over Seattle's 'Wild and Visionary' Boulevard Plan
A citizen raises alarms over the city's costly early attempts to expand public parks and infrastructure, accusing local real estate speculators of driving the vision.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
In a note to the Telegraph on the 15th inst., I called attention to the system of parks and boulevards now being projected by Mr. Schwagerl, superintendent of parks, by and with the advice and consent of the board of park commissioners. That system embraces an area in the city of Seattle of at least 100 square miles, with four main parks—one at Alki, one near the entrance to Salmon Bay, one at Sand Point on Lake Washington, and the other at the Bailey Peninsula on the same lake. These parks are to be connected with each other and the city by a system of boulevards from 150 to 250 feet wide. This wild and visionary scheme would not be worthy of serious consideration were it not for the fact that the promoters are industrious and persistent, and have enlisted the services and sympathies of some very good men in the matter, and worst of all, they are squandering the money of the city in direct violation of law. The park commissioners have no authority or jurisdiction outside of the city parks. The present movement originated at a meeting held in a real estate office. Seven out of ten of the members of this committee are real estate men. Why then do they want these parks purchased outside of the city limits, and this Schwagerl system of boulevards approved by some side action of the city council, unless it be to give a sort of quasi sanction to a map made to sell real estate by? This city is now cursed in a measure beyond computation by these wildcat additions, and real estate has been already boomed until the future is largely discounted.
“Whenever the real estate brokers get hungry for real estate to plat for sale, with narrow streets and small lots, they start this boulevard craze.”
This 1892 complaint against real estate interests driving municipal park planning prefigures a century of debates over how 'booster' culture and land speculation shape the physical footprint of Seattle. The skepticism toward 'wildcat' developments remains a permanent fixture of civic discourse in the city.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.