Same Streets
← All stories

The Great Park vs. Boulevard Debate

A skeptical citizen challenges the Park Commissioners' grandiose plans for miles of boulevards, calling them an unconstitutional overreach of power.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

After long, protracted and painful labor, the park commissioners have been delivered of their annual report. This rose-colored and musk-scented bantam is not yet open to the public. Accompanying this infant is a map that the real estate nurses of this committee of ten propose to preserve in memory of this delicate child, and when it is gone, they will drown their grief in the whirl of excitement connected with the sale of corner lots along the line of Schwager's grand boulevards. The report promises to transform Seattle into a veritable paradise: 150 miles of grand parked boulevards, one way for street cars, one for carriages, and no end of ways for pedestrians, including lovers' rambles. In view of the fact that it rains for at least six months of the year, would it not be a good idea for the board of park commissioners to shingle these boulevards while they are at it? This commission has deliberately and defiantly gone outside of its lines of duty, and according to its own showing, has spent $6,950 of the people's money for surveying streets and visionary boulevards. The monumental assurance of this board ought to bring a blush to the cheek of even a real estate broker hunting corner lots on Schwager's grand boulevards, astride of a government mule.

“The monumental assurance of this board ought to bring a blush to the cheek of even a real estate broker hunting corner lots on Schwager's grand boulevards, astride of a government mule.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893
Then · 1893133 years apartNow · 2026

This 1893 critique of the Park Commission echoes the perennial Seattle tension between ambitious urban planning and the accusations of 'boosterism' for private real estate interests. Just as the writer mocked the vision of massive boulevards, modern residents frequently debate the scale and cost of massive infrastructure projects that promise to reshape the city.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1893-01-11. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JAN 11, 1893, Page 7
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.60323, -122.33028 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗