The Right to Keep Your Home After a Tax Sale
Judge Langley rules on a pivotal case challenging whether the city can cut off a homeowner's redemption rights after property is sold for back taxes.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Judge Langley rendered a decision on a motion concerning the right to redeem property sold for delinquent taxes. Relator J. T. Hunt brought the suit against the city of Seattle after attempting to redeem his lot, which had been sold to H. C. Colver for unpaid 1890 taxes. The city treasurer had refused his tender of payment, claiming a new law had shortened the redemption period to one year, effectively cutting off the owner's rights. Judge Langley ruled in favor of the property owner, noting that the city's own charter did not explicitly limit these rights and that the law generally favors allowing owners to reclaim their property from tax liens. The motion to quash the mandamus was denied, ensuring that property owners retain a clear path to recover their homes.
“The general policy of the law favors redemption from tax sales and courts will not indulge distorted or doubtful constructions to defeat this object.”
This 1893 legal battle over tax-foreclosure redemption periods mirrors modern Seattle debates about property tax burdens and the vulnerability of homeowners facing displacement. It captures a core civic anxiety: when the state seizes land, how much power does the individual have to fight back and reclaim their ground?
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.