She Preferred the Name 'Goodlow' — So She Took It, and Now the Insurance Company Won't Pay
A Spokane woman who never married took out two life insurance policies, each under a different name. Now that she is dead, the company is refusing to honor either one.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Spokane — One of the most peculiar cases on record came to light in the superior court when a petition was filed by A. A. Timmons for letters of administration in the estate of Miss Cecil Smith, lately deceased.
It appears that Miss Smith was never married, but she took out two life insurance policies, each for $500 and both in the same company. One of the policies was made in the name of Cecil Smith and the other in the name of Marguerite Goodlow.
It appears that Smith did not seem to be a good name for the woman, in her opinion, and instead of taking the usual course — getting married — she changed her name to Goodlow without any formality whatever. Now the insurance company refuses to pay either policy on the ground that they were not regularly executed and that not sufficient proof of death can be furnished. It is probable that suit will have to be brought to collect both policies.
“Smith did not seem to be a good name for the woman, in her opinion, and instead of taking the usual course—getting married—she changed her name to Goodlow without any formality whatever.”
In an era before photo ID, Social Security numbers or digital records, a person's legal identity was only as solid as the papers they had filed — and an insurer could void a claim simply by pointing at the gaps. Miss Smith's small act of self-invention reads now as both a quiet assertion of independence and a reminder of how much of ordinary life still turns on proving, on paper, exactly who you are. Modern heirs still fight insurers over paperwork technicalities; the paperwork has changed, the argument has not.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.