The High Stakes of the 1916 Rail Strike
Railroad managers take their wage dispute with union employees directly to the public in an aggressive advertisement.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
To the American Public: Do you believe in arbitration or industrial warfare? The train employees on all the railroads are voting whether they will give their leaders authority to tie up the commerce of the country to enforce their demands for a 100 million dollar wage increase. The railroads are in the public service—your service. The railroads have proposed the settlement of this controversy either under the existing national arbitration law, or by reference to the Interstate Commerce Commission. This offer has been refused by the employees' representatives. Shall a nation-wide strike or an investigation under the Government determine this issue?
“Do you believe in arbitration or industrial warfare?”
This 1916 dispute mirrors modern debates over the role of government intervention in labor strikes versus collective bargaining, specifically regarding how public services are impacted by the economic demands of essential workers.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.