An Eastern Critique of Seattle’s ‘Young Men’s Party’
A skeptical observer from Brooklyn weighs in on the age-based political movements shaping Washington Territory.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Does it strike your young men who are now forming the 'Young Men’s Party' that their forthcoming State will be, territorially, the last in the progress of empire around the earth? ... You have natural advantages second to none round the globe. Is your 'Young Men’s Party' adequate to the occasion? Many people would like to know the precise age qualifying one for membership in that club. Is it deemed that a certain number of years destroys a man’s utility and safety as a citizen? ... If we must classify public eligibility by extrinsic personal conditions we may have an 'Old Man’s Political Club,' a 'Bald Headed Men’s Political Club.' ... Let us have a 'Reform Party,' or, what is more pat, a 'Third Party.'
“Let us have a 'Reform Party,' or, what is more pat, a 'Third Party.'”
The tension between youth-led reform movements and established political machinery remains a central theme in civic life. This 1884 letter highlights the perpetual anxiety over whether new, idealistic parties can actually overcome the entrenched corruption of two-party systems.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.