Same Streets
← All stories

A Homesteader, an Indian Agent and the Land at Lake Chelan

When a federal agent prepared to forcibly remove a homesteader from land newly allotted to Colville Indians, Judge Hanford drew a line: the eviction would have to go through the courts.

Judge Hanford Monday granted the application of A. W. La Chapelle for an injunction to restrain Capt. John W. Bubb, Indian agent of the Colville agency, and Cultus Jim, Chelan Bob and their wives from forcibly ejecting him from his claim as a homesteader on the former Columbia Indian reservation at Lake Chelan. The injunction was granted pendente lite in a decision which is as follows:

"The land in controversy is not within the limits of an Indian reservation. The complainant in good faith settled upon it and filed in the proper United States district land office an application to enter said land under the homestead law, and has since resided upon and cultivated the same and made valuable improvements thereon, and is now prepared to make proof of full compliance with the requirements of said law, so as to become entitled to a patent. The government, however, after receiving said homestead application, has included said land in allotments made to the Indian defendants herein, in fulfillment of a treaty stipulation made with Chief Moses and other Indians of the Colville and Columbia Indian reservations, and canceled the homestead filing made by the complainant. And the defendant Bubb, as Indian agent, now proposes and intends to eject the plaintiff from said premises by force and has given notice to that effect. The rights of the complainant and of the Indian defendants, respectively, to the land described in the complaint, has been the subject of a contest in the land department, and upon a final hearing of that matter the secretary of the interior has made a decision adverse to the plaintiff, pursuant to which his homestead filing was canceled as aforesaid. The complainant contends that said decision is erroneous, by reason of unfairness in the proceedings and of misconstruction of the law.

"Manifestly the plaintiff's contention is in good faith. Until a judicial determination of the questions of law affecting the same his claim to the land in controversy cannot be extinguished. If he has a superior right in law, irreparable injury will be done by dispossessing him. It is no part of the function pertaining to the office of an Indian agent to forcibly eject persons from premises not within the boundaries of an Indian reservation. If the Indians are entitled to possession they should make application for judicial process to enforce their rights according to the laws of the land. This court will not at the present stage of the case express any opinion as to the validity of the plaintiff's claim to the land, being the owner and in possession of valuable improvements which he has placed upon the land it is the duty of the court to protect his possession until the final hearing upon the merits."

Injunction granted.

“It is no part of the function pertaining to the office of an Indian agent to forcibly eject persons from premises not within the boundaries of an Indian reservation.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894
Then · 1894132 years apartNow · 2026

This ruling sits at the exact seam where homestead law and treaty allotment collided on former reservation land in Washington. A white settler with improvements got a court's protection while Colville families asserting treaty rights were told to file suit for process — a telling asymmetry. The land at Lake Chelan remains contested ground for the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation today, and water and property disputes there still carry this history.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1894-07-04. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JUL 4, 1894, Page 2
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
48.07859, -120.47571 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗