Same Streets
← All stories

The Indian Agent Who Let Settlers Stay: A Lake Chelan Land Fight

A federal Indian agent delayed an order to restore land near Lake Chelan to Indigenous owners, then waded into the estate of 'Okanogan' Smith, prompting charges of military overreach into civil affairs.

We have always opposed extending authority of the military arm of the government beyond its legitimate province. Wherever attempted it has been found that West Point training and barrack education are not adapted to the adjustment of civil affairs. Over a year ago Capt. J. W. Robb, U.S.A. and acting Indian agent, was ordered by the secretary of war to remove certain white settlers from lands near Lake Chelan which the secretary of the interior had decided were the property of Indians who had been forcibly ejected some years ago, and place the contesting Indians in possession. The captain, with the order in his pocket, or perhaps 'dispatch box' is the proper word, went to Chelan, interviewed the white settlers and advised them to prolong their trespass for a few months, extending it until the first of April, 1895. He is as tardy at Chelan to execute his orders, and if another extension is obtained perhaps tardy justice may be done to the Indians. A writ from a civil court would have been executed at once, and a United States marshal would have presumed to grant a year's time before enforcing its orders.

Again we see that 'Captain in the Army' appears to be sitting as a dictator or magistrate, or acting as a court of equity, or something of that kind, in the matter of the estate of the late 'Okanogan Smith.' The captain issues his ukase that 'Old Mary,' being the lawful wife of Mr. Smith, is entitled to his property to the exclusion of the white wife. The vexed question of the intermarriage of whites and Indians does not appear to worry the captain. Like another Alexander with his sword, he cuts the Gordian knot, or, as the telegram says, 'Does not recognize Smith's white wife in the settlement of the estate.' A military satrapy is not in harmony with our system of government. While the soldier deserves all honor for the performance of his duty in his proper sphere, once clothe him with civil functions and he is pretty sure to make an exhibition of his autocracy which is not pleasant to see or safe for the rights of the people.

“A military satrapy is not in harmony with our system of government. While the soldier deserves all honor for the performance of his duty in his proper sphere, once clothe him with civil functions and he is pretty sure to make an exhibition of his autocracy which is not pleasant to see or safe for the rights of the people.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895
Then · 1895131 years apartNow · 2026

The Lake Chelan dispute shows how federal agents could quietly bend land policy on the ground, delaying justice for Indigenous people while settlers remained. It rhymes with modern conflicts over tribal sovereignty, land restoration, and the limits of federal authority in local disputes.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1895-05-13. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, MAY 13, 1895, Page 4
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
48.07859, -120.47571 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗