The Railway Scheme That Failed
A phantom freight tariff, designed to crush independent grocers, is exposed and vetoed by the railroad manager himself.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Some days since, a clerk in the office of Mr. H. W. McNeill, superintendent of the Oregon Improvement Company, submitted a new tariff on freight for the Columbia & Puget Sound railroad. The sheet provided that the rates from Seattle to Newcastle should be raised from 25 cents to 75 cents per cwt, with similar drastic increases for Coal Creek, Black Diamond, and other points. The sheet further mandated that no shipments to these points should be taken for less than $1. This tariff was drawn up and marked to go into effect Monday, April 15. It was submitted to Manager McNeill, who immediately vetoed it. However, the vetoed sheet was accidentally sent down to the freight agent, Mr. Spencer, who, believing it authorized, posted copies for public viewing. A howl of indignation arose from retail grocerymen, who claimed the change was designed to cut off their trade and protect company-controlled stores. When the Post-Intelligencer confronted Manager McNeill, he confirmed: 'That tariff sheet was drawn and issued without my knowledge and authority, and is consequently void. I have ordered Mr. Spencer to discontinue the use of the tariff, change the station books, and refund all excess charges collected.' The new rates were in effect for only two days.
“The principal objectors were retail grocerymen... They claim that the change was made only to cut off their trade and to favor, protect and foster the stores at these various places that are controlled by the railroad company.”
This 1889 corporate blunder over logistics costs mirrors modern-day debates regarding 'last mile' delivery fees and the power of large platforms to undercut small, independent retailers. The conflict highlights how even in the late 19th century, Seattle merchants recognized that control over infrastructure was the primary weapon of economic dominance.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.