Seattle Council Accused in 1889 Tide Land Dispute
Tensions boil over at the Washington State Constitutional Convention as delegates clash over who owns the city’s waterfront—the people or the speculators.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
Olympia, August 14—The issue of the tide lands will be left to the legislature. The convention today continued its debate on public lands with a series of heated disputes. The core of the matter remains the disposal of state lands and the determination of rights to land beneath tide waters. A resolution introduced by Moore sparked a firebrand debate, accusing members of the city council—specifically naming Seattle—of being tide land grabbers. The resolution demanded that those who have an interest in tide lands disclose them and refrain from voting on related measures. The exchange between Moore and other delegates became personal and acrimonious, with Moore accusing opponents of defending 'cowardly insinuations' and 'blatant delinquency.' Despite the drama, the convention remained split on whether to allow municipalities to control their own harbor fronts or keep the power strictly under state authority, with many fearing that local control would simply play into the hands of the very speculators currently lobbying for the land.
“We are surrounded here by a lobby that deliberately asks us to lay down the bars and let them take possession of the people's own.”
The struggle over the Seattle waterfront in 1889—who owns the shoreline and who gets to profit from it—is the direct ancestor of modern battles over Seattle's public space, zoning, and waterfront access. The suspicion that powerful interests were manipulating the state constitution for private gain mirrors contemporary debates about the influence of developers and private corporations on city governance.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.