Same Streets
← All stories

The Waterfront Scandal: A Questionable Contract for Seattle’s New Fire Boat

The Washington Iron Works alleges that city officials bypassed proper oversight in a murky deal for the city's new fire-fighting vessel.

The story, cleaned up

A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.

The letter from the Seattle Dry Dock & Ship Building Company in today's Seattle Telegraph states that it is a reply to our letter of the 4th ult. Their reply consists of this: 'Their letter is a tissue of malicious lies prompted and uttered by a low and depraved nature, etc.' Our statements were definite enough; we dealt in no generalities, and yet this elegant piece of composition is all that they can bring forward. Even the Dry Dock Company and its managers must know that foul language, of which their letter is full, is not argument or anything else than simply foul language. The Dry Dock Company has strangely misread our letter, and but for the prompting of a guilty conscience, they had no necessity to reply to it at all. Our statements did not attack them, but did attack the method in which the contract was given to them by the city authorities, and we call upon those now in power to produce the original specifications for the fire boat and its machinery upon which bids were advertised for. Let those specifications be published and they will either confirm or effectually refute the statements contained in our letter.

“Even the Dry Dock Company and its managers must know that foul language... is not argument or anything else than simply foul language.”

— Printed in The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1891
Then · 1891135 years apartNow · 2026

Public contracting in Seattle has long been a flashpoint for scrutiny, mirroring today's debates over transparency in infrastructure spending and procurement. This 1891 dispute highlights the timeless tension between civic leaders and local businesses over how public money is allocated for essential city services.

The original page

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, 1891-01-02. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Seattle, Wash. Terr. [Wash.]) 1888-1914, JAN 2, 1891, Page 4
Rights
Public domain
Place
47.59457, -122.38772 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗