The Bureaucratic Cruelty of Chinese Exclusion
A Christian Chinese resident is denied the right to bring his wife to the United States following a restrictive court ruling.
The story, cleaned up
A cleaned-up reading of the newspaper page: spelling and layout repaired, one story lifted off a crowded page. It follows the original closely but it is not a transcription. The original page is below; read it if a detail matters.
The Secretary of the Treasury has just decided an interesting point arising under the Chinese immigration law. Joe James, a Chinaman residing in this country, and who has embraced the Christian religion, applied for permission to bring his wife, who is in China, to this country. The department decided, under a recent ruling of the United States Circuit Court of California, that she cannot be allowed to land.
“The department decided, under a recent ruling of the United States Circuit Court of California, that she cannot be allowed to land.”
This ruling highlights the arbitrary and mechanical application of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, which prioritized racial engineering over individual rights. It serves as a precursor to the systemic legal barriers that would culminate in the anti-Chinese riots of the following year in Seattle.
From readers
No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.