Same Streets
← All stories

Aberdeen's Broken Rail Promise

The city takes legal action against local investors after a transit company fails to deliver its promised electric railway.

The suit of the city of Aberdeen vs. Honey, Hamilton, Bridges, and Oumette has been commenced, and the papers have been served on the defendants. The action is brought upon a bond for the sum of $2,500 given by the defendants to the city in April 1891. The condition of the bond was that the Pacific Wheeless Electric Railway Company would have completed and in operation a system of street railway in Aberdeen within one year from that date, or in case of its failure to do so, the parties named above would pay the city $2,500. In consideration of this bond, a franchise was given to the company.

“The condition of the bond was that the Pacific Wheeless Electric Railway company would have completed and in operation a system of street railway in Aberdeen within one year.”

— Printed in Aberdeen Herald (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1892
Then · 1892134 years apartNow · 2026

Public-private partnerships and the frustration of stalled infrastructure projects are as much a part of Aberdeen's history as they are its modern reality. The legal battle highlights the early era's aggressive pursuit of transit growth through speculative bonds.

The original page

Aberdeen Herald (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, 1892-05-19. Library of Congress, Chronicling America.

From readers

No comments yet. If you know something about this story — a correction, a family memory, a source — it belongs here.

About this story

From
Aberdeen Herald (Aberdeen, Chehalis County, W.T.) 1886-1917, MAY 19, 1892, Page 5
Text
Cleaned up from the page — spelling and layout repaired — not a word-for-word transcription. The page itself is above, for exact wording.
Rights
Public domain
Place
46.97546, -123.81553 · placed automatically
The paper in the Library of Congress catalog ↗